Prediction of Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Daniel Lustig Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Van De Zandschulp vs D. Lustig

Botic Van De Zandschulp

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

396

Total Title

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

$500

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Daniel Lustig

CZE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

396

Total Title

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

$500

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Lustig

They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Daniel Lustig winning 0. The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Daniel Lustig was at the Czech Republic F11, 30-11-2016, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-3 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Zandschulp	1
Lustig	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R2) Czech Republic F11(11-30-16)

Stats

Botic Van De Zandschulp

Daniel Lustig

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs D. Lustig H2H Profile

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	D. Lustig
$3,676,420	Career Prize Money	$500
61.17% (378-240)	Career Total W/L	57.28% (181-135)
1	Indoor	0
7	Titles	4
1	Total H2H Matches	0
45.16% (14-17)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs D. Lustig Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 42.11% of points on their second serve, while Daniel Lustig has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Botic Van De Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 46.25% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniel Lustig has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.04% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Botic Van De Zandschulp has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel Lustig has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 50.00% of matches played (W/L 31/31), with Daniel Lustig winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Botic Van De Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/15). Daniel Lustig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 85/60), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 25/23).
Player level: In the last year, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/17), where as Daniel Lustig has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 1 times and Daniel Lustig being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Daniel Lustig winning 0.
The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Daniel Lustig was at the Czech Republic F11, 30-11-2016, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 139.08 while Daniel Lustig has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel Lustig has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Botic Van De Zandschulp has converted 34.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel Lustig has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Daniel Lustig Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs D. Lustig H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	D. Lustig
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
18	Aces (Total)	6
3	Total Double Faults	2
1:6:0	Average Match Time	1:6:0
57% (30/53)	1st Serve %	56% (29/52)
90% (27/30)	1st Serve Win %	62% (18/29)
57% (13/23)	2nd Serve Win %	52% (12/23)
60% (3/5)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/1)
42% (22/52)	Return Points Win %	25% (13/53)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
China Open - Beijing - 22-09-2025
Q3 Terence AtmaneT. Atmane	L	7-6(5) 7-6(7)	Stats
Q1 Christopher O'ConnellC. O'Connell	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
Chengdu Open - Chengdu - 15-09-2025
R1 Mackenzie McdonaldM. Mcdonald	L	6-4 3-6 6-3	Stats
Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, NED-ARG 1-3 - 08-09-2025
Rubber 2 Francisco CerundoloF. Cerundolo	L	7-6(4) 6-1	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 25-08-2025
R1 Holger RuneH. Rune	L	6-3 7-6(4) 7-6(2)	Stats

View All

D. Lustig Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Czech Republic F12 (Prague) - 27-11-2017
R2 Michael VrbenskyM. Vrbensky	L	6-3 4-6 7-6(5)	Stats
R1 Elmar EjupovicE. Ejupovic	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
Czech Republic F11 - 28-11-2016
R2 Botic Van De ZandschulpB. Van	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
R1 Tadeas ParoulekT. Paroulek	W	7-6(5) 6-1	Stats
Czech Republic F10 - 21-11-2016
R1 Jan MinarJ. Minar	L	3-6 6-3 7-5	Stats

View All

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs D. Lustig Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	D. Lustig
61.17% (378/240)	YTD Win/Loss	57.28% (181/135)
58.06% (864/624)	Sets Win/Loss	55.91% (402/317)
53.03% (7473/6618)	Games Win/Loss	52.40% (3533/3210)
58.27% (74/53)	Hard Win/Loss	58.70% (54/38)
61.59% (178/111)	Clay Win/Loss	58.62% (85/60)
65.14% (114/61)	Indoor Hard W/L	53.16% (42/37)
44.44% (12/15)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.44	Aces Per Game	0.02
3039	Aces Total	73
0.33	Double Faults Per Game	0.01
2260	Total Double Faults	33
1:36:41	Average Match Time	1st Match
392.63	Average Opponent Rank	503.29
62% (25341/41153)	1st Serve %	58% (318/544)
72% (18139/25341)	1st Serve Win %	73% (233/318)
48% (7602/15815)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (106/226)
43% (1866/4337)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (21/45)
41% (17267/42509)	Return Points Win %	37% (208/564)
58.93% (33/23)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
49.06% (26/27)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
60.00% (12/8)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
51.70% (76/71)	Main Tour W/L	50.00% (1/1)
63.33% (76/44)	Challenger W/L	46.30% (25/29)
69.82% (155/67)	Futures W/L	59.62% (155/105)
62% (350/562)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (178/309)
49% (21/43)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
53% (105/197)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (47/90)
57% (116/203)	Deciding Set Win %	55% (51/93)
89% (355/316)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (182/154)
11% (355/38)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (182/28)
23% (261/61)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (133/27)